Page 8 - THE REVELATION OF THE THIRD HEAVEN and THE MEAT OF THE WORD

as-text (Rev 22:18-19).

The italicised portions are part of God’s Word (Rev 22:18-19).

The division into the Old and New Testament occurs precisely at the chapters in
the 4 gospels recounting the Last Supper (Matthew Chapter 26, Mark Chapter 14,
Luke Chapter 22, John Chapter 13). This is proved by: Matthew 26:28, Mark
14:24 and Luke 22:20. The punctuation and capitalisation are part of the Word as a
matter of detail (Rev 22:18-19) as represented in the King James (there was no
punctuation in the original texts). The division between “The Old Testament” and
“The New Testament” should not be delineated other than by its introduction in the
text at the correct point in the first three gospels and at the end of John 13:18 (Rev
22:18-19). Otherwise a wrong division of The Scripture is perpretrated which only
aids the approach of hermeneutics and exegesis (2 Tim 2:15).

The default is that what is in the King James text is correct and therefore the 66 so-
called 'Book' Titles and various Chapter numbers and verse numbers should appear
as they do in the text (though not in the 'Books of the Bible' list which should be
deleted). This is because the 66 'books' are books but as sub-books in the book-of-
the-word (Deut 30:10, Rev 22:18-19) so the headings or names are correct. The
'book' referred to in 2 Kings 14:28, i.e. Chronicles (which is itself two such sub-

'books'), is a book but the book concerned is the Word (not Chronicles) as the dual
chapter of Chronicles is part of the book of the Word (Deut 28:58, 30:10, 31:26, 2
Kings 22:13, Rev 22:18-19). Where in Acts 1:20 it says "it is written in the book of
Psalms" it is referring to the mystery by which part of Psalms appears not in
Psalms but in Acts 1:20, this is explained later in this chapter. The Word is inerrant
in this case but is referring to the one book of the Word (Rev 22:18-19) which
contains a passage referred to as Psalms but which is yet only written in Acts 1:20.
As stated this is explained later (see Inexact 'Quotations').

No point of doctrine however should rest on capitalisation however as it is the
words that count (Rev 22:19). God is sometimes referred to with a small case ‘h’
in the word ‘he’ (Ex 3:5, 4:26, Zep 2:11 'he' and 'him', Rom 8:27, 1 John 3:9 ‘his’)
as is the Holy Ghost (1 Cor 12:11), ‘holy Spirit’ (Isaiah 63:10) and through the
gospels Jesus is referred to as a minor case ‘he’. It is not a question of whether by
our rules of grammar God should be a ‘He’ not a ‘he’, whatever the King James
text has is as God intends it, so God can be either (Rev 22:18-19). Since He is
both God and Man in one hypostatic union He/he can be either (John 1:12, 14).