Page 37 - THE REVELATION OF THE THIRD HEAVEN and THE MEAT OF THE WORD
P. 37

The Word can and does often switch in a passage, back and forth, from being both
               spiritually and factually true (Ezekiel 31:1-2) to being spiritually true and factually
               incorrect (Ezekiel 31:3-18, even within this passage there are times when it is
               factually correct as well as incorrect), the factually incorrect part being a story or
               expression designed to elucidate the spiritual truth (Mat 13:34, Mark 4:33-34).
               Jesus, who is the Word, used parables so it is no surprise that the Word uses them
               too (Mat 13:34, Mark 4:33-34).  God uses such factually incorrect passages or
               stories as they can be the most eloquent and direct way of expressing the spiritual
               truth (Mark 4:33).  God also uses them to hide truth in accordance with the Prime
               Principle and its necessary derivative that people only receive spiritual truth
               according to their desire for it (Mark 4:11-12, John 7:17).  This is why many of the
               factually incorrect passages in the Word are not announced as such (Mark 4:34) i.e.
               as parables (Mat 13:3) or riddles (Ezekiel 17:2) to introduce the necessary element
               of uncertainty, that only the discernment of the Holy Ghost can de-construct the
               meaning for us, if we co-operate.  Indeed a parable can even be factually true (Mat
               13:3-7) just as the Word is usually factually and literally true (1 John 5:6). In one
               sense of course all factually incorrect passages are announced as parables as the
               whole Word is a Parable (Psalm 78:2, note use of the singular word 'parable'). The
               Word is quite deliberately a mystery and designed as such (Eph 3:4).  Even as we
               understand more of God he will remain a mystery to us but not so as ever to
               prevent us from having perfect relationship with Him and being filled with the
               fullness of God (Eph 3:4, 18-19).


               In addition if the Word were factually true throughout it could more easily and
               obviously be interpreted better by reasoning, grammatical analysis, human
               comprehension and scientific endeavour, in short by scholarship (Isaiah 55:8-9, 1
               Cor 2:11-13.  Instead the Word can not be properly understood, deliberately, by
               such human means but only by the work of the Holy Ghost (1 Cor 2:11-16), in
               interactive communication with the heart of the believer (Mat 13:11-15, Luke
               24:32, 1 Cor 2:11-13, 2 Pet 1:20).   The more obvious non-factual elements of the
               Word are there to act as a rebuke from the Word to those who seek to establish that
               it is factually true throughout and as a reminder that only by the Holy Ghost’s work
               within us can we hope to interpret and understand it (Isaiah 55:8-9, 1 Cor 2:11-
               13).  Of course human reasoning is involved in understanding the Word but it is
               not sufficient (Acts 17:2).


               Cultural relativism is not a valid interpretative approach to the Word, so that those
               reading the King James text in English today can’t qualify the commandments of
               God by reference to the culture of ancient Palestine or 17th century England (Mat
               15:3, 6, Mark 7:9, 13, Rev 22:18-19).  Otherwise we could say about anything in
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42