Page 67 - THE REVELATION OF THE THIRD HEAVEN and THE MEAT OF THE WORD
P. 67

When the Word, through Paul, says that it speaks, as it were, ‘foolishly’ or as a
               ‘fool’ (2 Cor 11:17, 23); it is showing us a, factual, literal error (1 Cor 14:37) and
               highlighting it by using an expressive device.  This proves that the Word uses
               inaccuracy via expression and contains factual errors, whilst never being in error.
               It is spiritually inerrant in the single context of the one message or Word (2 Tim
               3:15-17).


               When Paul says “speak I, not the Lord” (1 Cor 7:12) he is referring to the fact that
               Jesus did not speak these words in his ministry on Earth.  What he writes is, of
               course,  the Word (1 Cor 7:12, 14:37, Rev 22:18-19) and therefore part of the
               totality of Jesus’ words expressed in the Word (John 1:1, 14, Rev 19:13, 16, 22:18-
               19).


               The words “after my judgement: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God” (1
               Cor 7:40) do not invalidate the doctrines being taught as applicable for those under
               the Law (Deut 28:58, 61, Rev 22:18-19). These phrases prove that it was possible
               to write, by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, the Word whilst unaware at the time
               that this process was occurring.  Paul was not sure that everything he wrote was
               from the Spirit of God at the time that he wrote it, only that he thought that this
               was the case (1 Cor 7:40).  The inspiration of translation or interpretation is
               therefore independent of the precise state of mind of the translator or the interpreter
               as to his work (1 Cor 2:10-11, 14-16).  John the Baptist did not publicly admit or
               even know in his conscious mind that his basic spirit was that of Elias come again
               (Mat 11:14, 17:12-13, Mark 9:13, Luke 1:17).


               All, Every and Inclusive Statements

               The default is that an ‘all’ or ‘nothing’ type statement, e.g. ‘whole’, is factually and
               spiritually true (John 1:1, 14, 7:17, 8:14).  Being a parable, full of parables, it is not
               always factually true (Psalm 78:2).  The Word, in context, does not ask of us that
               we believe that everyone  (‘he’) who digs a literal pit will fall into it (Eccl 10:8)
               and so this is an expression as the context makes this clear, as is the case with the
               rest of the verse which is another expression about hedge-removal.  Neither does it
               ask us to believe that birds of the air carry our voice, literally speaking (Eccl
               10:20).  By Love which is the Holy Ghost which is Truth we must discern when
               the Word is being expressive, and when it is being ‘literal’.  No culutural or
               grammatical 'rule' can tell us, only the Spirit (1 Cor 2:13).


               ‘Nothing’ can be an expression in the Word as in Amos 3:7 where if the word were
               to be literally true, the sum total of God’s eternal nature across all time and space
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72